Nuclear Knowledges - Peer reviewed paper

The false promise of nuclear risk reduction

sterre.vanbuuren — Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:07:58 +0000

Auteur:

Benoît Pelopidas and Kjølv Egeland

Date:

Mon, 08/01/2024

In a context of intensifying great power competition and deep divergences of view between nuclear and non-nuclear powers on the urgency of nuclear abolition, ‘nuclear risk reduction’ has gained renewed attention as a pragmatic framework for managing and progressively reducing nuclear dangers.

Liens:

OUP Link

Spreading the Burden: How NATO Became a ‘Nuclear’ Alliance

gregory.cales — Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:18:07 +0000

Auteur:

Kjølv Egeland

Date:

Mon, 17/02/2020

Liens:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09592296.2020.1721086?needAccess=tru...

The Ideology of Nuclear Order

gregory.cales — Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:10:28 +0000

Auteur:

Kjølv Egeland

Date:

Mon, 15/02/2021

Liens:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07393148.2021.1886772?casa_token=VeN...

Who stole disarmament? History and nostalgia in nuclear abolition discourse

gregory.cales — Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:07:25 +0000

Auteur:

Kjølv Egeland

Date:

Mon, 15/06/2020

Liens:

https://kjolvegeland.files.wordpress.com/2020/08/proofs-who-stole-disarmament.pd...

Normalisation of nuclear accidents after the Cold War

gregory.cales — Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:03:46 +0000

Auteur:

Valérie Arnhold

Date:

Mon, 12/10/2020

Liens:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14682745.2020.1806239?needAccess=tru...

European nuclear weapons? Zombie debates and nuclear realities

gregory.cales — Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:01:35 +0000

Auteur:

Kjølv Egeland et Benoît Pelopidas

Date:

Thu, 10/12/2020

Liens:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09662839.2020.1855147?needAccess=tru...

Unfit for purpose: reassessing the development and deployment of French nuclear weapons (1956–1974)

gregory.cales — Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:00:28 +0000

Auteur:

Benoît Pelopidas & Sébastien Philippe

Date:

Sun, 20/12/2020

Liens:

https://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/2scvddpp539naquk3h9m5sabjf/resources/2020-...

Correspondence: "new era or new error?"

benoit.pelopidas — Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:52:42 +0000

Auteur:

Benoit Pelopidas, Ryan Syner

Date:

Fri, 25/01/2019

Benoît Pelopidas and Ryan Snyder engage the claim that we have entered a "new era of counterforce". Instead, we show how such claims are based on an absence of analysis of fundamental physics and that assumptions of a particular tradition of nuclear thinking makes such findings foregone conclusions.

Liens:

https://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/6bi1nh2b6s9j3p7lojijksb9ve/resources/2019-...

Moderation as Courage

benoit.pelopidas — Sun, 03 Feb 2019 19:43:06 +0000

Auteur:

Magnus Feldmann, Benoit Pelopidas

Date:

Mon, 31/12/2018

This essay reflects on Stanley Hoffmann’s contributions as a scholar and public intellectual. We focus on Stanley Hoffmann’s scholarly, intellectual and ethical legacy by highlighting two sets of contributions, where his work challenged much international relations scholarship in the second half of the 20^th century. First, we identify the ways in which his research speaks to important policy concerns, whilst maintaining a certain detachment from the corridors of power.

The next generation(s) of Europeans facing nuclear weapons: forgetful, indifferent but supportive?

gregory.cales — Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:25:48 +0000

Auteur:

Benoit Pelopidas

Date:

Tue, 21/03/2017

The post-cold war generation of citizens is forgetting nuclear weapon-related dangers and becoming indifferent to the issue. At the same time, the absence of mass grassroots, anti-nuclear protest suggests tacit support for current nuclear weapon policies. These three common diagnoses are potentially contradictory and, more importantly, are only assumptions. This paper is the first systematic attempt at assessing the attitude of the under 30s generation of European Union (EU) citizens with regard to nuclear weapons.

Liens:

Lien vers la publication sur Spire